Posts Tagged ‘AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules’

The AAA Has Scheduled a Preliminary Hearing. What Should My Business Expect?

September 24th, 2026 American Arbitration Association, Arbitration Practice and Procedure, Arbitration Provider Rules, Arbitration Providers, Awards, Practice and Procedure, Preliminary Hearings, Small Business B-2-B Arbitration No Comments »

Introduction: The Preliminary Hearing Is Not the Trial—but it Can Shape the Arbitration

Preliminary HearingYour business has answered the arbitration demand, participated in selecting the arbitrator, and now the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) says the arbitrator wants to hold a preliminary hearing. What is that hearing, what will likely happen, and how should the business prepare?

The short answer is that the preliminary hearing ordinarily is not a trial on the merits. It is a case-management conference at which the arbitrator and the parties establish how the arbitration will proceed. But calling it a scheduling conference understates its importance. Decisions made there can determine how much discovery will occur, whether dispositive motions may be made, when the evidentiary hearing will take place, how and when witnesses and exhibits will be presented, and, ultimately, how much time and money the arbitration will consume.

This article picks up where our recent small-business articles on responding to an AAA arbitration demand and selecting an arbitrator from an AAA list left off. It assumes an ordinary business-to-business arbitration governed by the regular AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (the “AAA Commercial Rules”)—incorporated by reference by the terms of the contract—rather than the Expedited Procedures or the Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes. The parties’ contract may also modify the Rules, so counsel should always start with the arbitration agreement, reading it together with the contract’s incorporation of the Rules.

What Is an AAA Preliminary Hearing?

AAA Commercial Rule R-22 says that, depending on the size and complexity of the arbitration, the arbitrator should schedule a preliminary hearing “as soon as practicable” after appointment. AAA Commercial Rules R-22(a). The parties and their representatives should be invited and the conference may be in person, by videoconference or phone. AAA Commercial Rule R-22(a).

The purpose is practical. Rule R-22(b) directs the arbitrator and the parties to “be prepared  to discuss and establish a procedure for the conduct of the arbitration that is appropriate to achieve a fair, efficient, and economical resolution of the dispute.” AAA Commercial Rules R-22(b). Preliminary Hearing Procedures P-1 and P-2 of the AAA Commercial Rules address the issues to be considered at the preliminary hearing. See AAA Commercial Rule R-22(b); AAA Commercial Rules, Preliminary Hearing Procedures P-1–P-2.

Preliminary Hearing Procedure P-1(a) makes the same point about fairness, efficiency, and economics. P-1(b) urges that “[c]are must be taken to avoid importing procedures from court systems, as such procedures may not be appropriate to the conduct of arbitrations as an alternative form of dispute resolution that is designed to be simpler, less expensive and more expeditious.” Preliminary Hearing Procedures P-1(a) & (b).

Arbitration flexibility can be a major advantage, but only if the business and its counsel use it intelligently and not treat it as what some have referred to as “arbigation.” In the author’s experience, attorneys and businesses that have been involved in specialized, industry arbitration (such as reinsurance, maritime, FINRA, and others) tend to understand this better than persons who have more experience handling court litigation. Be that as it may, a well-conducted preliminary hearing can and should promote arbitration flexibility and informality.

What Will the Arbitrator Want to Discuss at the Preliminary Hearing?

Continue Reading »

The AAA Sent Me a List of Arbitrators. How Should My Business Choose One?

September 19th, 2026 American Arbitration Association, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Practice and Procedure, Arbitration Provider Rules, Arbitration Providers, Arbitrator Duty to Disclose, Arbitrator Lists and Ranking, Arbitrator Selection, Arbitrator Selection and Qualification Provisions, Evident Partiality, Impartiality, Independence No Comments »

Arbitrator Selection | AAA Commercial RulesThis is a small business guide to the default method of arbitrator selection under the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (the “AAA Commercial Rules”, available here). It picks up where our most recent article—a small business guide to the first few days of an AAA  arbitration—left off.

Like our most recent article, it assumes there is a business-to-business dispute governed by AAA Commercial Rules, the parties’ agreement does not prescribe an arbitrator selection regime, and that the AAA has sent the parties a list of potential neutral arbitrators under AAA Commercial Rule R-13.

Arbitrator selection is one of arbitrator’s most important features. More than 20 years ago, U.S. Circuit Judge Richard A. Posner (ret.) explained that the “cornerstone of the arbitral process” was the “[s]election of the decision maker by or with the consent of the parties. . . .” Lefkovitz v. Wagner, 395 F.3d 773, 780 (2005); see also Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662, 668, 670 (2010) (one of the FAA’s “rules of fundamental importance” is parties “may choose who will resolve specific disputes”) (emphasis added; citations omitted).

An AAA-proffered list of arbitrator candidates is not routine paperwork. The business should treat arbitrator selection as a major strategic decision, begin promptly the process, and work closely with experienced arbitration counsel in an effort to ensure informed, deliberate choices are made throughout it.

The arbitrator will manage the proceeding, resolve discovery and procedural disputes, hear the evidence, apply the governing law and contract, and ultimately decide who wins and what relief, if any, should be awarded to whom. In most cases, judicial review of the resulting award will be extremely limited.

Given the stakes, the parties are likely to disagree on who an ideal candidate should be.

So what should a business do when it receives an AAA list of arbitrator candidates? Continue Reading »

I Just Received an Arbitration Demand Under the AAA Commercial Rules. What Should I Do First?

September 14th, 2026 American Arbitration Association, Arbitrability, Arbitral Seat, Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration and Mediation FAQs, Arbitration Fees, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Practice and Procedure, Arbitration Provider Rules, Arbitration Providers, Arbitration Risks, Arbitration Situs, Arbitrator Selection and Qualification Provisions, Authority of Arbitrators, CPLR Article 75, Insurance Coverage, New York Arbitration Law (CPLR Article 75), Uncategorized No Comments »

Introduction: Treat the AAA Demand as a Legal Proceeding, Not Routine Business Mail

AAA Commercial Arbitration Demand | First Steps After Receipt

Received an American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) arbitration demand? Wondering what to do?

The short answer is: contact experienced arbitration counsel immediately. Do not put the arbitration demand in the same pile as ordinary contract correspondence, and do not wait to see what happens next. An AAA commercial arbitration is an adjudicative proceeding that can end in a final, binding, confirmed award fully enforceable in court. Important deadlines can begin running as soon as the AAA sends notice that an arbitration demand  has been filed.

This article assumes a business-to-business contract calling for AAA arbitration under the AAA Commercial Arbitration) Rules and Mediation Procedures (eff. June 1, 2026) (the “AAA Commercial Rules,” available here). It assumes the dispute is not subject to the AAA’s Expeditated Procedures or its Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes.

A respondent (i.e., a person against whom the arbitration demand is made) ordinarily has 14 calendar days after the AAA sends notice of the filing of the demand to file an answering statement. If no answer is filed, the claim is deemed denied, but the arbitration continues. AAA Commercial Rule R-5(a). Do not treat that deemed denial as permission to ignore the deadline, because other objections may have to be raised at or before the answer.

There is also an important timing wrinkle. Under Rule R-4, the Continue Reading »

Delegation Agreements, Separability, Schein II, and the October 2019 Edition of CPR Alternatives

November 12th, 2019 Appellate Practice, Arbitrability, Arbitrability | Clear and Unmistakable Rule, Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Practice and Procedure, Arbitration Provider Rules, Clear and Unmistakable Rule, Contract Interpretation, Delegation Agreements, FAA Chapter 1, Federal Arbitration Act Enforcement Litigation Procedure, Federal Arbitration Act Section 2, Federal Arbitration Act Section 3, Federal Arbitration Act Section 4, Practice and Procedure, Separability, Severability, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, United States Supreme Court 1 Comment »
Delegation Provision

There have been a number of important cases decided in 2019 concerning the application and effect of “delegation provisions”—clear and unmistakable agreements to arbitrate arbitrability issues. Delegation provisions, which we’ll refer to as “delegation agreements,” are not a recent phenomenon, and are quite common, especially in administered arbitration, where consent to applicable arbitration rules typically includes clear and unmistakable consent to arbitrate arbitrability. But there’s been a good deal of judicial controversy this year over whether delegation agreements should, in certain circumstances, be given the full force and effect that they deserve.  

We think that delegation provisions should ordinarily be enforced as written and according to their terms. When Courts interpret and apply delegation agreements, they should, consistent with Rent-a-Center West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010), consider those agreements to be separate and independent from the arbitration agreements in which they are contained.

Much of the controversy has centered on whether terms of the arbitration agreement should define or circumscribe the scope of the delegation agreement and even effectively negate it. Consequently, certain courts have conflated the question of who gets to decide whether an issue is arbitrable with the separate question of what the outcome of the arbitrability dispute should be, irrespective of who decides it. 

The SCOTUS Schein Decision and The Fifth Circuit’s Schein II Decision on Remand

The first significant delegation-agreement development this year came on

Continue Reading »