<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The AAA Commercial Rules and the Pig in a Poke:  Gilbert Street Developers, LLC v. La Quinta Homes, LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/the-aaa-commercial-rules-and-the-pig-in-a-poke-gilbert-street-developers-llc-v-la-quinta-homes-llc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/the-aaa-commercial-rules-and-the-pig-in-a-poke-gilbert-street-developers-llc-v-la-quinta-homes-llc</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:49:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jackson v. Rent-a-Center West, Inc.: Who Gets to Decide Whether an Arbitration Agreement is Unconscionable when the Parties Clearly and Unmistakably Say the Arbitrators Decide Arbitrability? &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/the-aaa-commercial-rules-and-the-pig-in-a-poke-gilbert-street-developers-llc-v-la-quinta-homes-llc/comment-page-1#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson v. Rent-a-Center West, Inc.: Who Gets to Decide Whether an Arbitration Agreement is Unconscionable when the Parties Clearly and Unmistakably Say the Arbitrators Decide Arbitrability? &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=808#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>[...] to decide arbitrability when the parties clearly and unmistakably so agree.  (See, e.g., here and here.)  That’s all well and good, but what happens when:  (a)  two parties sign an arbitration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to decide arbitrability when the parties clearly and unmistakably so agree.  (See, e.g., here and here.)  That’s all well and good, but what happens when:  (a)  two parties sign an arbitration [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disputing Makes it to Diane Levin&#8217;s 5 ADR Blogs to Add to Your Reading List &#171; Disputing</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/the-aaa-commercial-rules-and-the-pig-in-a-poke-gilbert-street-developers-llc-v-la-quinta-homes-llc/comment-page-1#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Disputing Makes it to Diane Levin&#8217;s 5 ADR Blogs to Add to Your Reading List &#171; Disputing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=808#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>[...] Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Forum provides discussion and insights on reinsurance litigation and arbitration and is published by New York-based boutique commercial and industry arbitration firm Loree &amp; Loree. This blog demonstrates quality writing on newsworthy topics that distinguish the top ADR blog; a recent example is &#8220;The AAA Commercial Rules and the Pig in a Poke: Gilbert Street Developers, LLC v. La Quinta Homes, L...&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Forum provides discussion and insights on reinsurance litigation and arbitration and is published by New York-based boutique commercial and industry arbitration firm Loree &amp; Loree. This blog demonstrates quality writing on newsworthy topics that distinguish the top ADR blog; a recent example is &#8220;The AAA Commercial Rules and the Pig in a Poke: Gilbert Street Developers, LLC v. La Quinta Homes, L&#8230;&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum and Four Other ADR Blogs Make Diane Levin’s “Top Five Tuesdays” List Of New ADR Blogs &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/the-aaa-commercial-rules-and-the-pig-in-a-poke-gilbert-street-developers-llc-v-la-quinta-homes-llc/comment-page-1#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum and Four Other ADR Blogs Make Diane Levin’s “Top Five Tuesdays” List Of New ADR Blogs &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=808#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>[...] Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum provides discussion and insights on reinsurance litigation and arbitration and is published by New York-based boutique commercial and industry arbitration firm Loree &amp; Loree. This blog demonstrates quality writing on newsworthy topics that distinguish the top ADR blog; a recent example is &#8220;The AAA Commercial Rules and the Pig in a Poke: Gilbert Street Developers, LLC v. La Quinta Homes, L...&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum provides discussion and insights on reinsurance litigation and arbitration and is published by New York-based boutique commercial and industry arbitration firm Loree &amp; Loree. This blog demonstrates quality writing on newsworthy topics that distinguish the top ADR blog; a recent example is &#8220;The AAA Commercial Rules and the Pig in a Poke: Gilbert Street Developers, LLC v. La Quinta Homes, L&#8230;&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
