<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stolt-Nielsen Oral Argument Analysis: Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/stolt-nielsen-oral-argument-analysis-part-i/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/stolt-nielsen-oral-argument-analysis-part-i</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 22:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds, Inc.: What are the Implications for Reinsurance Arbitration? &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/stolt-nielsen-oral-argument-analysis-part-i/comment-page-1#comment-8820</link>
		<dc:creator>Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds, Inc.: What are the Implications for Reinsurance Arbitration? &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=1920#comment-8820</guid>
		<description>[...] read our prior posts on Stolt-Nielsen here,  here, here, here, here, here, here, here,  here, here, here, here, here and here.  (Certain of these posts contain links to articles on Stolt-Nielsen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read our prior posts on Stolt-Nielsen here,  here, here, here, here, here, here, here,  here, here, here, here, here and here.  (Certain of these posts contain links to articles on Stolt-Nielsen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip J. Loree Jr.</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/stolt-nielsen-oral-argument-analysis-part-i/comment-page-1#comment-8673</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip J. Loree Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=1920#comment-8673</guid>
		<description>Bernard, 

Thanks for your comment.  I either overlooked or was not aware of that fact, and stand corrected.  

I guess that&#039;s why she asked no questions at oral argument! :) 

All the best, 

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard, </p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.  I either overlooked or was not aware of that fact, and stand corrected.  </p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s why she asked no questions at oral argument! <img src='http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>All the best, </p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Persky</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/stolt-nielsen-oral-argument-analysis-part-i/comment-page-1#comment-8670</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Persky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=1920#comment-8670</guid>
		<description>Justice Sotomayor did not hear the oral argument in the Animalfeeds case.
She had recused herself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Sotomayor did not hear the oral argument in the Animalfeeds case.<br />
She had recused herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stolt-Nielsen Oral Argument Analysis, Part V: Should Class or Consolidated Arbitration be Imposed if the Contract is Silent? &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/stolt-nielsen-oral-argument-analysis-part-i/comment-page-1#comment-7781</link>
		<dc:creator>Stolt-Nielsen Oral Argument Analysis, Part V: Should Class or Consolidated Arbitration be Imposed if the Contract is Silent? &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=1920#comment-7781</guid>
		<description>[...] series on the Stolt-Nielsen oral argument.  It addresses the fourth issue identified in Part I (here):  what the import of the agreements’ silence is or should be.  It assumes the Court reaches [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] series on the Stolt-Nielsen oral argument.  It addresses the fourth issue identified in Part I (here):  what the import of the agreements’ silence is or should be.  It assumes the Court reaches [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stolt-Nielsen Oral Argument Analysis: Part III &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/stolt-nielsen-oral-argument-analysis-part-i/comment-page-1#comment-6979</link>
		<dc:creator>Stolt-Nielsen Oral Argument Analysis: Part III &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=1920#comment-6979</guid>
		<description>[...] Class Action Waivers, Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings, United States Supreme Court No Comments &#187; By Philip J. Loree [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Class Action Waivers, Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings, United States Supreme Court No Comments &#187; By Philip J. Loree [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stolt-Nielsen Oral Argument Analysis: Part II &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/stolt-nielsen-oral-argument-analysis-part-i/comment-page-1#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>Stolt-Nielsen Oral Argument Analysis: Part II &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=1920#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>[...] Class Action Waivers, Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings, United States Supreme Court No Comments &#187; By Philip J. Loree [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Class Action Waivers, Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings, United States Supreme Court No Comments &#187; By Philip J. Loree [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

