The March 2010 issue of Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, the excellent newsletter of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (“CPR”), featured as its cover story an article I wrote on Rent-A-Center West v. Jackson, No. 09-497, and Granite Rock Co. v. Int’l Brotherhood of Teamsters, No. 08-1214, two of the three cases pending before the United States Supreme Court this term. The article is entitled “It’s Time for Doctrines: The Supreme Court Wrestles with ‘Severability’ and the ‘Clear and Unmistakable’ Standard.”
These two cases involve, to some degree, the Buckeye Check Cashing/Prima Paint doctrine of severability—a/k/a “separability.” Rent-A-Center also examines the “clear and unmistakable doctrine,” under which arbitrators can decide arbitrability questions if the parties clearly and unmistakably so agree.
Rent-a-Center, which arises under the Federal Arbitration Act, raises the question whether courts or arbitrators get to decide whether an arbitration agreement is unconscionable if the parties clearly and unmistakably agree to submit arbitrability questions to arbitration. (See our prior posts here, here and here.) Granite Rock, which arises under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, concerns whether, on the facts presented, arbitration must go forward and what it should encompass. (See our prior post here.)
In the article I argue that both cases were wrongly decided by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and that, in Granite Rock, the Ninth Circuit reached the right result (an order compelling arbitration) for the wrong reasons. I predict that the United States Supreme Court will reverse the Rent-A-Center decision and vacate the Granite Rock decision.
Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation is a subscription-only publication. Anyone interested in obtaining a copy of the article can request one at this page. Subscription information is available at that page, too, as well as publisher John Wiley & Sons, here.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank CPR, and Russ Bleemer, Editor of Alternatives, for their kind assistance and support in featuring my article. Russ is not only a keen, professional editor, but a pleasure to work with as well.
Tags: Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardengna, CPR, Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution, Jackson v. Rent-a-Center, Prima Paint v. Conklin, Separability, severability
