<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arbitration Nuts &amp; Bolts: Vacating Arbitration Awards &#8212; Part II:  Corruption, Fraud and Undue Means</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/arbitration-nuts-bolts-vacating-arbitration-awards-part-ii-corruption-fraud-and-undue-means/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/arbitration-nuts-bolts-vacating-arbitration-awards-part-ii-corruption-fraud-and-undue-means</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 22:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omer Losiewski</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/arbitration-nuts-bolts-vacating-arbitration-awards-part-ii-corruption-fraud-and-undue-means/comment-page-1#comment-38819</link>
		<dc:creator>Omer Losiewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=2022#comment-38819</guid>
		<description>I am really thankful to this topic because it really gives great information `&#039;;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really thankful to this topic because it really gives great information `&#8217;;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arbitration Nuts &#38; Bolts: Vacating Arbitration Awards – Part IIIA: Evident Partiality (Expectations of the Parties) &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/arbitration-nuts-bolts-vacating-arbitration-awards-part-ii-corruption-fraud-and-undue-means/comment-page-1#comment-7146</link>
		<dc:creator>Arbitration Nuts &#38; Bolts: Vacating Arbitration Awards – Part IIIA: Evident Partiality (Expectations of the Parties) &#124; Loree Reinsurance and Arbitration Law Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=2022#comment-7146</guid>
		<description>[...] Part III of our Nuts &amp; Bolts feature on vacating arbitration awards (Parts I and II  here and here) we consider the second statutory ground for vacating an award under the Federal Arbitration Act:  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part III of our Nuts &amp; Bolts feature on vacating arbitration awards (Parts I and II  here and here) we consider the second statutory ground for vacating an award under the Federal Arbitration Act:  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip J. Loree Jr.</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/arbitration-nuts-bolts-vacating-arbitration-awards-part-ii-corruption-fraud-and-undue-means/comment-page-1#comment-7028</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip J. Loree Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=2022#comment-7028</guid>
		<description>Steve, 

Thanks for your note.  That fact pattern sounds vaguely familiar to me, too.

I think it was one of those cases that brought to the forefront the importance of addressing in ethics rules the multi-jurisdictional aspects of law practice here in the U.S.  In terms of its use as a ground for vacatur based on &quot;undue means,&quot; I doubt the unauthorized practice of law was really the sort of thing the statute was designed to address, but the court&#039;s rationale was probably at least plausible.  

I hope things are going well and that the New Year brings prosperity for all!

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, </p>
<p>Thanks for your note.  That fact pattern sounds vaguely familiar to me, too.</p>
<p>I think it was one of those cases that brought to the forefront the importance of addressing in ethics rules the multi-jurisdictional aspects of law practice here in the U.S.  In terms of its use as a ground for vacatur based on &#8220;undue means,&#8221; I doubt the unauthorized practice of law was really the sort of thing the statute was designed to address, but the court&#8217;s rationale was probably at least plausible.  </p>
<p>I hope things are going well and that the New Year brings prosperity for all!</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Buchwalter</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/arbitration-nuts-bolts-vacating-arbitration-awards-part-ii-corruption-fraud-and-undue-means/comment-page-1#comment-7025</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Buchwalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=2022#comment-7025</guid>
		<description>Hi Phil.

Nice article.  While I can&#039;t recall the cite, I think I may have read a case about an unlicensed attorney (e.g., NY attorney doing an arbitration in CA where he is not licensed) constituted undue means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil.</p>
<p>Nice article.  While I can&#8217;t recall the cite, I think I may have read a case about an unlicensed attorney (e.g., NY attorney doing an arbitration in CA where he is not licensed) constituted undue means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip J. Loree Jr.</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/arbitration-nuts-bolts-vacating-arbitration-awards-part-ii-corruption-fraud-and-undue-means/comment-page-1#comment-6956</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip J. Loree Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=2022#comment-6956</guid>
		<description>Hello, Paul -- thanks for your comment.  

I cannot recall offhand a case where a court upheld a challenge on undue means grounds.  That said, the courts in the A.G. Edwards and United Parcels Service cases cited in the post rejected undue means claims.  

There have been a fair number of cases that have considered motions to vacate under Section 10(a)(1), and I&#039;ll let you know should I come across one where a court vacated an award on undue means grounds. 

Best wishes for the Holiday Season,  

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Paul &#8212; thanks for your comment.  </p>
<p>I cannot recall offhand a case where a court upheld a challenge on undue means grounds.  That said, the courts in the A.G. Edwards and United Parcels Service cases cited in the post rejected undue means claims.  </p>
<p>There have been a fair number of cases that have considered motions to vacate under Section 10(a)(1), and I&#8217;ll let you know should I come across one where a court vacated an award on undue means grounds. </p>
<p>Best wishes for the Holiday Season,  </p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul bennett marrow</title>
		<link>http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/arbitration-nuts-bolts-vacating-arbitration-awards-part-ii-corruption-fraud-and-undue-means/comment-page-1#comment-6923</link>
		<dc:creator>paul bennett marrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loreelawfirm.com/blog/?p=2022#comment-6923</guid>
		<description>I have never run across a fact pattern suggesting undue means. Can you suggest one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never run across a fact pattern suggesting undue means. Can you suggest one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

